Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 10, 2010, 12:34:56 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
VOLCBAT has now officially converted to ACE2. Members, please ensure that you have it installed and updated to the required version.
35256 Posts in 1996 Topics by 468 Members
Latest Member: shamanhorde1915
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  VOLCBAT
|-+  Recent Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: Today at 12:04:01 PM 
Started by Zippy - Last post by Niall
Being a youth,
Game Gear, well it was my dads but from about 3 I used to play Sonic on it.
PS1, got it in 1997 with Crash Bandicoot and Spyro. Fucking brilliant for a 5 year old boy, and also my dad.
Then our families first PC in 1998/99, was pretty nifty at the time, had some 3d graphics card in it. Played Tomb Raider, Championship Manager and Delta Force 2 on it.
PS2 I got for Christmas 2002, with FIFA 2003, both that and my PS1 (albeit now chipped) are still functionable.
Then a XP Desktop in 2003, had a 3.0ghz Pentium 4 and loadsa other shit. Cost a fucking bomb but played all the games of the time on it.
Dell Desktop in 2007 (i think?) has a 2.8ghz dual core, 8600gt and 2 gb RAM. Still functions as the family PC. Main games, Counter Strike Source and Team Fortress 2.
Xbox 360 in 2008. Even though my brothers had one from release.
Current PC, got in 2009. Got Athelon Black Edition 3.0ghz dual core, and some other shit. What I play arma on, only cost me £400.

 2 
 on: Today at 12:34:26 AM 
Started by Jonny - Last post by Hovis
The media is a business, and you don't make money telling people things that they don't want to hear or that they don't want to believe. Re-affirming what people believe and telling them what they want to hear is actually a much better business model than telling the truth, which is how Fox News does so well. When you're dealing with a corporate and thus profit driven media there is no public service motive.

It's not all the work of the media though. Governments are very closely bound to the media these days. That's how you get a former News of the World editor sitting at the right hand of Cameron in Number 10. The old mob were as bad, with Campbell keeping the press on a very tight leash while Blair was in charge- and look at the demolition job they did to the BBC after the Hutton Inquiry. The BBC ran with a story they weren't suppose to and got fucked. In the USA post 9/11 the media turned into nodding dogs as well. It's a cycle of dependence, the media need favours from the government, they need access, they need laws tweaked and so on, and the government need the media to sell them to the people.

Though that said it's still a golden age for freedom of information. The mass media is shite, but the Internet provides more than they ever could.

 3 
 on: Yesterday at 11:18:42 PM 
Started by Jonny - Last post by Chris
Heh, good point Niall.

The whole thing is pretty ironic really, and highlights how self serving the media can be. It's only because of the media that this guys actions might actually have global consequences. If he'd got nothing more than a brief mention in his local paper, it'd be just another one of the hundreds of fucking retarded actions that go on every day and don't hit the mainstream news. Nobody would have known better or blinked twice. Now, the media make his little book burning well known. And now they're condemning it. And now they're making a bucketload of paper sales off a nice controversial headline from it.

Sometimes I think the media love scoring own goals in the name of sales. I suppose the problem starts with all of us really; people don't want the news, they want to be entertained with the "news". And these media companies exist to make money, so they'll supply what we demand. Still, it always gets to me everytime I see the media laying into an issue that wouldn't have existed in the first place if they'd just decided that they had a duty to -not- give things like this free publicity, and instead kept their fucking gobs shut.

 4 
 on: Yesterday at 10:15:13 PM 
Started by Jonny - Last post by Niall
How can you bring Scientology into a conversation on Religion?

 5 
 on: Yesterday at 09:56:04 PM 
Started by Jonny - Last post by Prydain
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11255366

 6 
 on: Yesterday at 08:02:09 PM 
Started by Chief - Last post by Chief
Ok cheers Jez and  Chris. I'll wait to hear from you both here or on MSN

 7 
 on: Yesterday at 07:59:51 PM 
Started by Jonny - Last post by Hovis
I think it's funny that people think that Muslims, particularly in Afghanistan, might be offended by the burning of a book as opposed to say, what happened at Guatanamo Bay, Abu Graib or, more recently, what these fine specimens of the American military machine got up to:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11252987

Quote
A group of US soldiers murdered a number of Afghan civilians and took body parts as trophies, documents released by military officials allege.

The charging sheets relate to allegations that five US soldiers were involved in the murders of civilians in January, February and May of this year.

A further seven servicemen are accused of a conspiracy to cover up the crimes.

And sure these are only allegations, and sure innocent until proven guilty, but you don't make an allegation of soldiers taking body parts as trophies unless you find some body parts.

Anything some southern white trash preacher does to a bunch of books pales into insignificance alongside the actions of the US military in Afghanistan and Iraq. If you're some angry Islamic type bloke you can find plenty of reasons that aren't completely retarded to pick up an AK in the name of Admiral Ackbar. Everybody from the Pope to the President is slating that guy for burning some books and how it might provoke Islam, when the US military is romping around Iraq and Afghanistan fucking up everybody's shit. It's bordering on the surreal. Where was the concern over provoking the enemy when the US Army was taking pictures of people it was torturing in Iraq? Why don't they care about provoking Islam when they give shitloads of cash to Israel? Obama and his ilk are willing to talk about respecting this and not wanting to anger that, but fundamentally talk is really fucking cheap.

Regarding what Lunatic said about being held to ransom by Islam, I think this is an illusion more than anything. The media is not scared of Islam, people are not scared of Islam, but the media acts like it is, because it fits with the accepted belief that Islam is a crazy religion full of lethal nutters. If they didn't act like Islam was this scary bunch of people you don't want to mess with then it would be much harder to convince people that they were dangerous. You're more likely to see a Christian murder an abortion clinic employee than a Muslim murder a guy for offending Islam in the West. The threat is nothing, the 'ransom' is the media pretending to be scared. Think of it like this, when there's a war how many journalists turn up? Hundreds, from all over the place, because believe it or not plenty of journalists are extremely brave. Men and women who will rock into a war zone, unarmed, often embedded within the lead combat elements. They risk their lives, the TV channels and so forth are willing to let them die for the cause, and yet these self same news agencies claim to be scared of Islam? My arse. Any threat Islam appears to pose to free speech is a total fake.

You want to see a religion actually hold the media to ransom, check out Scientology. Nobody, but nobody, fucks with them. Hajjis only have bombs. Scientologists have lawyers.

 8 
 on: Yesterday at 07:56:56 PM 
Started by Chief - Last post by Jez
Also added..

 9 
 on: Yesterday at 06:22:36 PM 
Started by Rho - Last post by Numptie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2H-SOqbQoA

Because you see, they are Jedi and they are arseholes...so it is funny.


Freddie Wong is awesome.


This is my kind of movie:

 10 
 on: Yesterday at 05:27:26 PM 
Started by Jonny - Last post by Niall
Fucking aye, I agree.

It's showing that people are worried about extremists in second/third world countries.

You don't see westerners causing a fuss when there is a video of a Flag or effegy or bible being burnt on the news, so why should it cause issues to others?

DOWN WITH RELIGION, VIVA THE REVOLUTION.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!